QLD
Price
$91.25
Change
-$6.43 (-6.58%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.59B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URTY
Price
$83.25
Change
-$2.59 (-3.02%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
377.53M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs URTY

QLD vs URTY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY)

Key Takeaways

  • QLD delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index (101 large-cap non-financial companies, tech-heavy at ~55%), while URTY provides 3x leverage to the Russell 2000 Index (~1,930 small-cap stocks with balanced sector exposure).
  • Both share a 0.95% net expense ratio but URTY's higher leverage amplifies volatility, suiting short-term tactical trades over buy-and-hold due to daily rebalancing and compounding effects.
  • QLD's top holdings like NVDA (5.6%), AAPL (4.6%), and MSFT (3.3%) drive tech-led growth; URTY offers broader diversification across financials (~16%), industrials (~18%), and healthcare (~16%).
  • URTY positions for small-cap rotations amid rate stabilization, while QLD benefits from mega-cap innovation but faces concentration risk in fewer holdings.
  • Leverage decay impacts longer holds more in URTY's 3x structure versus QLD's 2x, emphasizing daily monitoring for both non-diversified funds using derivatives like swaps and futures.
  • Recent market cycles highlight URTY's relative strength in risk-on small-cap rallies versus QLD's outperformance in tech-driven uptrends.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) offer leveraged exposure to distinct U.S. equity segments, making them relevant for investors navigating sector rotations and macroeconomic shifts. QLD targets 2x the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100, emphasizing large-cap technology leaders, while URTY seeks 3x the Russell 2000's small-cap benchmark. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide alternative high-conviction plays: QLD for growth-oriented tech momentum and URTY for value-driven small-cap breadth. In the current environment of potential rate pauses and broadening market participation, comparing their structures helps traders assess risk-adjusted positioning amid volatility differences and daily reset mechanics.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), launched in 2006, is a leveraged ETF seeking daily investment results corresponding to 2x the Nasdaq-100 Index—a modified market-cap-weighted benchmark of 101 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies. It achieves this through derivatives like swaps and futures contracts, with daily rebalancing to maintain target exposure. The fund is non-diversified, holding a representative sample via financial instruments rather than physical stocks.

Top holdings (as of recent data) include NVDA (5.6%), AAPL (4.6%), MSFT (3.3%), AMZN (3.2%), and GOOGL (2.5%), with the top 10 comprising ~30-40%. Sector allocations skew heavily to technology (~55%), communication services (~19%), and consumer cyclical (~14%). The net expense ratio is 0.95% (gross 0.98%), with quarterly distributions. QLD's tight bid-ask spreads (~0.01%) support strong liquidity for tactical trading.

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) Overview

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY), inception 2010, aims for 3x the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index, tracking ~1,930 small-cap U.S. companies by market cap from the Russell 3000. Like QLD, it employs derivatives (swaps, futures) for leveraged exposure, daily rebalancing, and non-diversified structure, avoiding direct dividend reflection from the index.

URTY mirrors the Russell 2000's broad base without concentrated top holdings dominating (top 10 ~3-5% each, e.g., industrials/tech leaders like Bloom Energy). Sectors are diversified: industrials (~18%), financial services (~16%), healthcare (~16%), technology (~17%), and consumer cyclical (~12%). Net expense ratio matches at 0.95% (gross 1.08%), with quarterly payouts. Liquidity remains solid (bid-ask ~0.05%), though small-cap volatility elevates risk versus large-cap peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Nasdaq-100 and Russell 2000 represent divergent equity universes amid evolving macro drivers. Large-cap tech thrives on AI innovation, cloud computing, and global scalability, buoyed by record profit margins (e.g., tech at 29% in Q1 2026), but faces valuation scrutiny and capex fatigue. Small caps, via Russell 2000, gain from domestic cyclical recovery, fiscal stimulus like infrastructure spending, and potential rate stability easing debt burdens—higher floating-rate exposure amplifies benefits.

Recent capital flows favor small-cap rotations, with equal-weight indices outperforming mega-caps, alongside sector shifts to industrials, materials, and energy. Regulatory tailwinds (e.g., reshoring policies) and geopolitical tensions boost U.S.-centric small caps, while broader risks like persistent inflation or policy holds pressure growth stocks. Both indices navigate earnings cycles, with small caps projecting superior 2026 growth.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, URTY has shown relative strength amid small-cap rotations, outperforming QLD as the Russell 2000 surges ~8-12% year-to-date versus modest large-cap gains, marking the longest streak since the 1990s. This reflects sector shifts from tech (worst performer early 2026) to cyclicals like industrials and financials, amplified by URTY's 3x leverage versus QLD's 2x.

Over broader cycles, QLD excels in tech-led rallies, leveraging Nasdaq-100 momentum from mega-cap earnings, but experiences sharper drawdowns in corrections due to concentration. URTY's higher beta (~4x market) heightens volatility in risk-off environments yet captures small-cap breadth during economic expansions and rate pauses. Daily resets cause divergence from underlying indices over time, with URTY more prone to decay in choppy markets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like leveraged ETFs. Explore it today to uncover hidden opportunities in real time.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors URTY with moderate conviction (~60% probability of near-term outperformance), driven by small-cap momentum, superior projected earnings growth, broader diversification, and sector rotation tailwinds in recent market cycles. URTY's exposure to cyclicals positions it for economic broadening, though its elevated volatility warrants caution versus QLD's trend consistency in growth regimes. Structural factors like cost parity and liquidity support tactical allocation, not long-term holding.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. URTY commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and URTY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 14.6B vs. URTY (378M). URTY has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: URTY (61.683) vs QLD (38.760). QLD was incepted earlier than URTY: QLD (20 years) vs URTY (16 years). QLD (0.95) and URTY (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . URTY has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDURTYQLD / URTY
Gain YTD38.76061.68363%
Net Assets14.6B378M3,862%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.95100%
Turnover16.0091.0018%
Yield0.120.6219%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDURTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URTY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPHD49.840.10
+0.20%
Invesco S&P 500® High Div Low Vol ETF
SPBW28.66-0.05
-0.17%
AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF
DBEZ62.74-0.20
-0.31%
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF
QMMY26.41-0.09
-0.33%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
HPI16.07-0.11
-0.68%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund

URTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URTY and SMCI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URTY and SMCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URTY
1D Price
Change %
URTY100%
+2.70%
SMCI - URTY
31%
Poorly correlated
+15.66%