Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs WEBL
QLD vs WEBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. WEBL commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and WEBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 9B vs. WEBL (162M). WEBL has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: WEBL (15.243) vs QLD (14.207). QLD was incepted earlier than WEBL: QLD (19 years) vs WEBL (6 years). QLD (0.95) and WEBL (0.98) have comparable expense ratios . WEBL has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| QLD | WEBL | QLD / WEBL | |
| Gain YTD | 14.207 | 15.243 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 9B | 162M | 5,558% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.98 | 97% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 61.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 0.22 | 0.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| META - QLD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| SNPS - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||
WEBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBL | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| AMZN - WEBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| HUBS - WEBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| NET - WEBL | 70% Closely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| BKNG - WEBL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| DASH - WEBL | 69% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||