QLD
Price
$89.55
Change
+$1.53 (+1.74%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
13.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WEBL
Price
$28.72
Change
+$0.99 (+3.57%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
92.79M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs WEBL

QLD vs WEBL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL)

Key Takeaways

  • QLD delivers 2x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, a broad basket of 100 large non-financial companies, while WEBL provides 3x daily exposure to the narrower Dow Jones Internet Composite Index focused on internet-centric firms.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged structures with daily rebalancing, resulting in compounding effects that make them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding.
  • Expense ratios are comparable, with QLD at 0.95% and WEBL at 0.96%, though WEBL's higher leverage amplifies both potential returns and volatility.
  • QLD offers broader technology sector diversification across software, hardware, and consumer electronics, whereas WEBL concentrates on internet commerce, advertising, and related sub-sectors.
  • Structural differences in underlying indices lead to varying sensitivity to interest-rate environments and growth-stock rotations within technology.
  • Liquidity profiles favor QLD due to higher trading volume and assets under management (AUM), supporting tighter spreads for institutional and retail investors.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) both provide leveraged equity exposure within the technology and internet sectors. They do not compete directly as core holdings but serve as tactical tools for investors seeking amplified daily returns tied to growth-oriented benchmarks. In the current market environment, where technology leadership and digital transformation remain central themes, these funds offer differentiated ways to express views on sector momentum while highlighting the trade-offs of leverage, concentration, and rebalancing mechanics.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund uses derivatives such as swaps and futures to achieve this leveraged exposure and holds approximately 100 underlying components indirectly through its strategy. Top holdings typically reflect heavy weights in leading technology names including NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Meta Platforms. Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive, leveraged product, it employs daily rebalancing to reset exposure, which introduces compounding effects over multiple periods. Distinguishing features include its long history since 2006 and relatively deep liquidity compared with other leveraged vehicles.

Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) Overview

Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X ETF (WEBL) targets daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% (3x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. The underlying index comprises approximately 40 of the largest and most liquid U.S. internet companies selected for deriving a majority of revenue from online activities. Top holdings commonly include Amazon, Meta Platforms, Cisco, Alphabet, and Arista Networks. Sector exposure centers on interactive media, internet services, and software. The expense ratio is 0.96%. This passive, leveraged ETF also resets daily through derivatives, leading to potential divergence from the stated multiple over longer horizons. Key structural traits include its thematic focus on pure-play internet firms and more concentrated risk profile relative to broader technology benchmarks.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology and internet sectors continue to benefit from secular drivers including artificial intelligence adoption, cloud computing expansion, and digital advertising growth. Capital flows into growth equities have fluctuated with interest-rate expectations and earnings cycles of dominant platforms. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, antitrust concerns, and content moderation remains an ongoing factor. Macroeconomic influences such as inflation trends and monetary policy shifts affect valuation multiples across high-growth names. Sector risks include elevated valuations, competitive pressures from new entrants, and potential slowdowns in consumer spending on digital services. These dynamics create an environment where leveraged vehicles can magnify both upside participation and downside volatility during rotation or consolidation phases.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QLD has generally exhibited lower volatility than WEBL due to its 2x leverage factor and broader index composition. WEBL's 3x structure and narrower internet focus have produced sharper moves during periods of strong digital-advertising or e-commerce momentum. Relative positioning shows QLD capturing broader technology leadership across hardware and software leaders, while WEBL amplifies returns from internet-specific sub-sectors. Both funds have demonstrated sensitivity to interest-rate sentiment, with performance diverging based on earnings results from top holdings and shifts in growth versus value preferences. Over multiple weeks and months, compounding from daily resets has caused returns to deviate from simple multiples of benchmark performance, underscoring the importance of holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Professional and retail investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged products and sector exposure may find the platform useful for refining strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The 2x leverage factor combined with broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100 Index offers a comparatively balanced risk exposure relative to WEBL’s 3x concentration in internet names. Cost efficiency remains similar, yet QLD’s liquidity profile and established rebalancing mechanics support more consistent trend alignment during technology-driven market regimes. Investors should evaluate these factors against personal risk tolerance and time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. WEBL commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and WEBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.9B vs. WEBL (92.8M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than WEBL: QLD (27.295) vs WEBL (5.177). QLD was incepted earlier than WEBL: QLD (20 years) vs WEBL (7 years). QLD (0.95) and WEBL (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . WEBL has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
QLDWEBLQLD / WEBL
Gain YTD27.2955.177527%
Net Assets13.9B92.8M14,978%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.9699%
Turnover23.0060.0038%
Yield0.130.1493%
Fund Existence20 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDWEBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WEBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAK144.020.74
+0.52%
iShares US Insurance ETF
FMNY25.540.11
+0.43%
First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF
PAYM25.00-0.22
-0.87%
TrueShares S&P Autcll Defesv Inc ETF
FTGC31.31-0.30
-0.93%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF
DGZ5.16-0.21
-3.95%
DB Gold Short ETN

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
+1.74%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
DOCU - QLD
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ALGN - QLD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
OKTA - QLD
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More

WEBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEBL
1D Price
Change %
WEBL100%
+3.57%
CVNA - WEBL
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
NET - WEBL
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
GTM - WEBL
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNOW - WEBL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
W - WEBL
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More