QLD
Price
$89.12
Change
-$2.65 (-2.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
13.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XDQQ
Price
$40.71
Change
+$0.06 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
54.96M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs XDQQ

QLD vs XDQQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) delivers daily 2x leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index through a swap-based structure, while Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) employs a defined-outcome options strategy targeting 2x upside returns of Invesco QQQ Trust to a quarterly cap with approximately 1x downside exposure.
  • Both ETFs concentrate on large-cap technology and growth stocks within the Nasdaq-100 universe, but differ fundamentally in risk management: QLD amplifies daily moves without caps, whereas XDQQ incorporates outcome-period resets and upside limitations.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.95% for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) compared to 0.79% for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ), reflecting the latter’s more complex options overlay.
  • ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) maintains broad holdings aligned with the Nasdaq-100 (typically over 100 positions), while Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) derives exposure synthetically via options on the underlying Invesco QQQ Trust.
  • Structural distinctions position ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) for investors seeking un-capped daily leverage and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) for those preferring defined quarterly outcomes with partial downside protection.
  • Both products target similar thematic exposure to technology sector momentum but employ divergent mechanisms that influence volatility, rebalancing frequency, and suitability across market cycles.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) both provide leveraged access to Nasdaq-100 technology and growth equities, yet they employ distinct strategies that address different investor objectives. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they offer alternative approaches within the same broad sector for investors seeking amplified exposure to large-cap innovation leaders. The comparison highlights structural contrasts in leverage implementation, risk controls, and cost efficiency that matter for portfolio construction in the current technology-driven market environment.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The ETF uses financial instruments such as swaps and derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective and holds a portfolio that generally mirrors the index constituents. It features more than 100 holdings with heavy weighting toward mega-cap technology names. Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The expense ratio is 0.95%. As a passive leveraged product, it resets exposure daily, making it suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold without active monitoring.

Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) Overview

Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) pursues a defined-outcome strategy that seeks to provide double (2x) the upside return of Invesco QQQ Trust to a quarterly cap, with approximately single exposure to the downside before fees and expenses. The fund employs options overlays that reset at the end of each three-month outcome period. Exposure is synthetic rather than direct holdings of individual stocks. The expense ratio is 0.79%. This structure introduces an upside participation limit while offering a degree of downside cushion relative to un-capped leveraged products. The ETF can be held across multiple periods as the options reset quarterly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly Nasdaq-100 constituents, continues to benefit from secular trends in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital transformation. Capital flows into growth equities remain sensitive to interest rate expectations, corporate earnings of dominant semiconductor and software companies, and broader macroeconomic conditions. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy, alongside geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, represent ongoing risks. Sector rotation toward or away from technology often coincides with shifts in growth versus value preferences and changes in monetary policy.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has exhibited higher volatility due to its daily 2x reset mechanism, amplifying both gains and losses relative to the underlying Nasdaq-100. Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) has shown more contained upside participation because of its quarterly caps, while providing a different risk profile through its options-based downside characteristics. Relative positioning depends on trend consistency in mega-cap technology earnings and interest rate environments, with the leveraged daily product responding more immediately to short-term momentum and the defined-outcome vehicle offering more predictable quarterly boundaries.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted exposure characteristics observable in the current environment, Tickeron’s AI would assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) for investors prioritizing defined outcomes and lower expense ratios within the leveraged Nasdaq-100 theme, while recognizing ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) for those seeking maximum daily amplification without caps.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. XDQQ commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and XDQQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.4B vs. XDQQ (55M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than XDQQ: QLD (26.684) vs XDQQ (2.959). QLD was incepted earlier than XDQQ: QLD (20 years) vs XDQQ (5 years). XDQQ (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95).
QLDXDQQQLD / XDQQ
Gain YTD26.6842.959902%
Net Assets13.4B55M24,364%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.79120%
Turnover16.00N/A-
Yield0.120.00-
Fund Existence20 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDXDQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XDQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGIRX96.310.29
+0.30%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R5
FSATX18.37-0.04
-0.22%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
ERBCX19.18-0.06
-0.31%
Eaton Vance Equity Strategy C
FMEFX48.60-0.43
-0.88%
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp R6
WICGX7.37-0.25
-3.28%
William Blair China Growth I

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-2.89%
LRCX - QLD
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
NVDA - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
KLAC - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
MU - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
More