Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMLX
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
Price$29.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets495.21M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 495M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QLSGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.01). QLSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.31 vs. WCMLX (6.46). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. QLSGX (12.62).
| QLSGX | WCMLX | QLSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.79 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.444 | 1.166 | 381% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 43.7M | 1,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.31 | 6.46 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.84 | 12.74 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.62 | 15.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement