Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMLX
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMLX
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QLSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.02). QLSGX (91.00) and WCMLX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. WCMLX (2.81). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. WCMLX (-7.51).
| QLSGX | WCMLX | QLSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.79 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.226 | 3.852 | 421% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 47.2M | 1,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 2.81 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.79 | 23.40 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.15 | -7.51 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers