Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMNX
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
Price$31.48
Change+$0.20 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.6M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 522M vs. WCMNX (44.8M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: QLSGX (9 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.01). QLSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.35 vs. WCMNX (3.33). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.36 vs. WCMNX (15.09).
| QLSGX | WCMNX | QLSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.04 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.909 | 5.201 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 44.8M | 1,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.35 | 3.33 | 461% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 19.73 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.36 | 15.09 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement