Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMNX
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMNX
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 830M vs. WCMNX (55.2M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: QLSGX (10 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.02). QLSGX (91.00) and WCMNX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.21 vs. WCMNX (29.32). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : 9.22 vs. WCMNX (-1.46).
| QLSGX | WCMNX | QLSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 2.04 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.180 | 14.908 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 830M | 55.2M | 1,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.21 | 29.32 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.53 | 37.30 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.22 | -1.46 | -633% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement