Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMNX
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMNX
QLSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. WCMNX (47.2M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: QLSGX (10 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.02). QLSGX (91.00) and WCMNX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. WCMNX (2.55). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. WCMNX (-8.65).
| QLSGX | WCMNX | QLSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 2.04 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.226 | 3.690 | 440% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 47.2M | 1,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 2.55 | 578% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.79 | 22.49 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.15 | -8.65 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers