58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLVE vs YUMC
QLVE vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts QLVE vs YUMC
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$27.92
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
Volume$180
Net Assets14.11M
Yum China Holdings
Price$44.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization16.48B
QLVE vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLVE vs. YUMC commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLVE is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLVE | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVE and AP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVE and AP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | N/A | ||
| AP - QLVE | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| ZTO - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| JD - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| YUMC - QLVE | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMR - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +7.69% | ||
More | ||||
YUMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| YUM - YUMC | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| HDL - YUMC | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| DPZ - YUMC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ARCO - YUMC | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| FRSH - YUMC | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||