Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMGCX vs VFWPX
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts QMGCX vs VFWPX
Invesco Advantage International C
Price$11.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.69M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMGCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. QMGCX (44.7M). QMGCX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: QMGCX (3.35) vs VFWPX (2.76). QMGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: QMGCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). QMGCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). QMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). QMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: QMGCX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). QMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.63 vs. VFWPX (12.63). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. QMGCX (24.17).
| QMGCX | VFWPX | QMGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.03 | 6,433% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 0.03 | 9,033% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.622 | 17.798 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.7M | 68B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 2.76 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.63 | 12.63 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 41.37 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.17 | 41.51 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement