Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMGCX vs VFWPX
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts QMGCX vs VFWPX
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMGCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. QMGCX (41.8M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than QMGCX: VFWPX (2.62) vs QMGCX (1.67). QMGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: QMGCX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). QMGCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). QMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). QMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: QMGCX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. QMGCX (26.91). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.99 vs. QMGCX (23.68).
| QMGCX | VFWPX | QMGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 6,533% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.03 | 7,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.861 | 15.685 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.8M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.62 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.91 | 30.83 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 61.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.68 | 35.99 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.63 | 107.69 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement