Ad is loading...
QQH vs SCHG
QQH vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts QQH vs SCHG
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Price$69.26
Change+$1.01 (+1.48%)
Volume$16.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.55
Change+$0.25 (+0.88%)
Volume$24.56K
CapitalizationN/A
QQH vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QQH vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQH is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 37.9B vs. QQH (570M). SCHG (39.225) and QQH (38.086) have matching annual dividend yield . QQH was incepted earlier than SCHG: QQH (5 years) vs SCHG (15 years). QQH has a higher turnover SCHG (9.00) vs SCHG (9.00).
| QQH | SCHG | QQH / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 38.086 | 39.225 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 570M | 37.9B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 9.00 | 500% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.43 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QQH | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQH | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| CDNS - QQH | 73% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| SNPS - QQH | 73% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MSFT - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| AMZN - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LRCX - QQH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
More | ||||