QQQ
Price
$713.97
Change
+$3.04 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 21, 01:17 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
489.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QYLG
Price
$29.54
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 21, 11:46 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
167.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQ vs QYLG

QQQ vs QYLG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 15, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) vs. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) offers direct exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index through a passive strategy, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) employs a covered call overlay that generates income but caps upside potential.
  • QQQ maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.18% compared to QYLG’s 0.35%, making it more cost-efficient for long-term buy-and-hold investors.
  • Both ETFs provide concentrated exposure to large-cap technology and growth-oriented companies, with similar top holdings including NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT).
  • QYLG’s covered call strategy enhances yield but introduces trade-offs in total return during strong equity rallies, resulting in a distinct risk-return profile versus QQQ’s unhedged approach.
  • QQQ features greater liquidity and broader institutional adoption, while QYLG appeals to investors seeking enhanced income within the same underlying equity universe.
  • Structural differences position QQQ for pure growth participation and QYLG for a balanced growth-plus-income outcome in volatile or range-bound market environments.

Introduction

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) both deliver exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index yet pursue different investment objectives. QQQ tracks the index directly, providing unfiltered access to leading technology and growth companies. QYLG layers a covered call strategy on similar holdings to generate additional income. These ETFs do not compete head-to-head; instead, they offer complementary strategies for investors targeting Nasdaq-100 sector exposure with varying priorities around growth, income, and risk management. The comparison remains relevant amid ongoing innovation-driven market cycles and shifting interest-rate expectations.

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) Overview

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund holds approximately 103 securities, weighted by modified market capitalization. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corp (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN), and Broadcom Inc (AVGO), with technology and communication services sectors dominating allocations. The expense ratio stands at 0.18%. As a unit investment trust structure, QQQ maintains full replication with periodic rebalancing aligned to index changes. Distinguishing features include high liquidity, deep institutional ownership, and direct participation in the performance of innovative large-cap companies without derivatives overlays.

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) Overview

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) seeks to track the Cboe Nasdaq 100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index, combining equity exposure to the Nasdaq-100 with a systematic covered call strategy. The fund holds roughly 104 securities mirroring the underlying index constituents. Top holdings align closely with those of QQQ, led by NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT). Sector allocations remain heavily weighted toward technology. The expense ratio is 0.35%. QYLG sells out-of-the-money call options on approximately half the portfolio to generate premium income, introducing a growth-plus-income profile. This active options overlay differentiates it from pure passive replication while retaining core equity exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the technology and growth equity sector, driven by artificial intelligence adoption, semiconductor innovation, and cloud computing expansion. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, corporate earnings cycles, and capital expenditure trends in AI infrastructure influence performance. Regulatory developments around antitrust scrutiny of large technology firms and potential shifts in global supply chains represent ongoing considerations. Sector risks include valuation compression during risk-off environments and concentration in a handful of mega-cap names. Capital continues to flow toward innovation themes, supporting demand for Nasdaq-100 exposure across varying market regimes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) has exhibited higher volatility and greater upside capture during technology rallies, reflecting its unhedged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has delivered more moderate returns with enhanced distribution yields, as the covered call component provides income during sideways or modestly rising periods but limits participation in sharp advances. Relative positioning favors QQQ for investors prioritizing capital appreciation and QYLG for those emphasizing income generation alongside equity growth. Sector rotation toward or away from technology influences both funds, though QYLG’s options strategy dampens sensitivity to extreme moves compared with QQQ’s direct index tracking.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ). The lower expense ratio, full upside participation in Nasdaq-100 constituents, and superior liquidity profile provide a more efficient vehicle for capturing sector momentum and long-term growth trends. While Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) offers attractive income features, its higher cost and capped return potential reduce relative attractiveness in environments favoring sustained equity appreciation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQ vs. QYLG commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQ is a Hold and QYLG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQ has more net assets: 489B vs. QYLG (167M). QQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than QYLG: QQQ (16.842) vs QYLG (13.906). QQQ was incepted earlier than QYLG: QQQ (27 years) vs QYLG (6 years). QQQ (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QYLG (0.35). QYLG has a higher turnover QQQ (7.98) vs QQQ (7.98).
QQQQYLGQQQ / QYLG
Gain YTD16.84213.906121%
Net Assets489B167M292,814%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.3551%
Turnover7.9814.8054%
Yield0.446.137%
Fund Existence27 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQQYLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QYLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WOFRX68.760.43
+0.63%
Allspring Opportunity R6
LIORX15.610.07
+0.45%
ClearBridge International Value R
BNIVX15.04-0.04
-0.27%
Barrow Hanley International Value I
HIMCX24.60-0.16
-0.65%
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
LAFVX23.02-0.18
-0.78%
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6

QYLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLG has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QYLG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QYLG
1D Price
Change %
QYLG100%
-0.12%
LRCX - QYLG
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.33%
AMAT - QYLG
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.53%
KLAC - QYLG
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
ASML - QYLG
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
NVDA - QYLG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More