QQQI
Price
$54.24
Change
+$0.19 (+0.35%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
14.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QQQT
Price
$17.97
Change
+$0.08 (+0.45%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
48.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQI vs QQQT

QQQI vs QQQT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) vs. Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT)

Key Takeaways

  • Both QQQI and QQQT are actively managed ETFs that combine Nasdaq-100 equity exposure with options-based strategies to generate high monthly income.
  • QQQI holds a portfolio of Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells call options on the Nasdaq-100 Index (NDX), while QQQT primarily holds shares of an ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 and employs daily credit call spreads.
  • QQQI maintains broader direct equity holdings (approximately 100 positions) and an expense ratio of 0.68%, whereas QQQT uses a more concentrated structure centered on one underlying ETF with a higher expense ratio of 1.20%.
  • The funds target similar investor goals of income generation with equity upside potential but differ in options mechanics, which influences risk profiles, upside participation, and tax efficiency.
  • Both operate in the derivative-income category and are positioned for investors seeking elevated yields from technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 exposure amid ongoing sector momentum.
  • Structural differences in holdings diversification and options implementation create distinct relative positioning for income-focused portfolios.

Introduction

Investors seeking high-yield exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index often compare options-enhanced ETFs that blend equity ownership with derivatives. QQQI and QQQT both pursue current income through call-option strategies while retaining equity participation, yet they employ different implementation methods. These ETFs do not track identical benchmarks or structures, making them alternatives rather than direct competitors for income-oriented investors within the technology and growth sector. The comparison highlights how variations in holdings, options tactics, and costs affect suitability across market cycles.

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Overview

The NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in Nasdaq-100 Index constituents and implements a call-options overlay. It holds approximately 100-104 individual stocks, with top positions typically including large technology names such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Broadcom. Sector allocations are heavily weighted toward technology and communication services, reflecting the underlying index composition. The fund sells call options on the Nasdaq-100 Index to generate premium income, aiming for high monthly distributions in a tax-efficient manner alongside potential equity appreciation. Its expense ratio stands at 0.68%. The strategy emphasizes a covered-call approach that balances income generation with participation in equity market movements.

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) Overview

The Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) is an actively managed fund that primarily holds shares of an unaffiliated passively managed ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, such as Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), and overlays a daily credit call spread strategy. This structure results in a highly concentrated holdings profile dominated by the underlying ETF, supplemented by options positions and minimal cash. The fund sells daily credit call spreads on the Nasdaq-100 Index to produce option premiums, targeting a high annual income level paid monthly. Its expense ratio is 1.20%. The approach seeks current income while retaining some upside exposure through the spread mechanics, distinguishing it from traditional covered-call implementations.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the technology and growth-oriented Nasdaq-100 ecosystem, where capital flows have favored innovation-driven sectors amid advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. Macroeconomic drivers include interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles of dominant holdings, and broader equity-market sentiment. Regulatory developments around options usage and tax treatment of distributions remain relevant for income strategies. Sector risks encompass valuation compression during risk-off periods, concentration in a handful of mega-cap names, and volatility tied to macroeconomic shifts or geopolitical events. These factors influence the broader environment for derivative-income products targeting Nasdaq-100 exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered elevated distribution yields relative to traditional equity benchmarks, driven by options premiums collected during periods of moderate volatility. QQQI’s direct stock holdings and index-call overlay have supported participation in Nasdaq-100 rallies while capping some upside in strong uptrends. QQQT’s credit-spread approach has emphasized income consistency with a more defined risk-reward profile on the options leg. Relative positioning shows QQQI offering greater diversification across individual holdings, whereas QQQT provides streamlined exposure centered on the index ETF. Volatility differences arise from the distinct options methodologies, with both funds exhibiting sensitivity to Nasdaq-100 earnings seasons and sector rotation dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing income-focused Nasdaq-100 strategies may find the tool useful for discovering additional ideas aligned with their objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as broader holdings diversification, lower expense ratio, and established options implementation for income generation, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to the NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) for investors prioritizing structural efficiency and equity participation alongside yield. The Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) offers a distinct, more concentrated approach that may appeal in specific income-targeting scenarios. This assessment reflects relative positioning rather than a guarantee of future results.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQI vs. QQQT commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQI is a Buy and QQQT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQI has more net assets: 14.2B vs. QQQT (48.9M). QQQT has a higher annual dividend yield than QQQI: QQQT (13.920) vs QQQI (8.122). QQQI was incepted earlier than QQQT: QQQI (3 years) vs QQQT (2 years). QQQI (0.68) has a lower expense ratio than QQQT (1.20). QQQT has a higher turnover QQQI (8.00) vs QQQI (8.00).
QQQIQQQTQQQI / QQQT
Gain YTD8.12213.92058%
Net Assets14.2B48.9M29,039%
Total Expense Ratio0.681.2057%
Turnover8.0012.0067%
Yield1.2913.5310%
Fund Existence3 years2 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQIQQQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QQQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSMC44.190.43
+0.97%
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF
VFQY178.221.34
+0.76%
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
GYLD14.530.11
+0.75%
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
SPHD53.23-0.09
-0.17%
Invesco S&P 500® High Div Low Vol ETF
MYY15.11-0.07
-0.48%
ProShares Short MidCap400

QQQI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQQI
1D Price
Change %
QQQI100%
+0.35%
LRCX - QQQI
75%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AMAT - QQQI
71%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
KLAC - QQQI
70%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ASML - QQQI
69%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
MU - QQQI
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More