QQQM
Price
$293.76
Change
+$0.97 (+0.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
104.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOVR
Price
$20.35
Change
+$0.35 (+1.75%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQM vs XOVR

QQQM vs XOVR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) vs. ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) provides low-cost passive exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) uses an active strategy blending public equities with limited private-company exposure via special purpose vehicles (SPVs).
  • QQQM holds approximately 100-106 securities with heavy concentration in technology, whereas XOVR maintains a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 30-35 holdings including select private assets.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly: QQQM charges 0.15%, compared with XOVR’s 0.75% management fee, creating a notable cost advantage for the passive fund over long holding periods.
  • Sector allocations in QQQM emphasize technology and communication services, while XOVR incorporates healthcare, financial services, and private-market themes alongside similar growth-oriented public names.
  • QQQM offers greater liquidity and broader diversification across large-cap growth names; XOVR provides differentiated access to entrepreneurial and pre-IPO opportunities within an exchange-traded structure.
  • Structural differences position the two ETFs as complementary rather than direct substitutes for investors seeking large-cap growth exposure with varying risk and thematic preferences.

Introduction

Investors evaluating growth-oriented equity exposure often compare passive benchmarks with active or thematic strategies. Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) both target innovative large- and mid-cap companies but employ fundamentally different approaches. QQQM delivers straightforward, rules-based tracking of the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XOVR introduces active management and limited private-market participation. These distinctions make the pair relevant for investors assessing cost efficiency, liquidity needs, and appetite for unique crossover exposure in the current environment of technological advancement and evolving capital markets.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Overview

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the investment results of the NASDAQ-100 Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange and applies a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with issuer caps. The fund typically holds 100-106 securities and maintains physical replication. Top holdings commonly include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and META, with technology representing the dominant sector allocation. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. Rebalancing occurs quarterly with annual reconstitution, and the fund distributes dividends quarterly. Its open-end structure supports high liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads.

ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) Overview

ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation through equity securities of mid- and large-capitalization companies traded on major U.S. exchanges, supplemented by a policy-capped sleeve of select private companies accessed via special purpose vehicles. The strategy incorporates the proprietary Entrepreneur Factor model. The fund typically holds 30-35 positions, with notable public holdings including NVDA, GOOGL, META, and ALAB, alongside private exposure such as SPV interests in SpaceX. Sector weights emphasize technology, communication services, and healthcare. The management fee is 0.75%. Holdings are reviewed actively, and the fund provides daily liquidity while disclosing positions regularly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth and technology innovation landscape, influenced by artificial intelligence development, semiconductor demand, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation. Capital continues to flow toward companies demonstrating scalable business models and entrepreneurial characteristics. Private-market access remains a focus for investors seeking earlier-stage opportunities without traditional lock-up periods. Macroeconomic factors including interest-rate expectations, regulatory developments around technology platforms, and global supply-chain dynamics affect sector momentum. Risks include concentration in high-valuation growth names, potential volatility from private-asset valuation adjustments, and broader equity-market sensitivity to economic cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has reflected the performance trajectory of leading Nasdaq-listed growth companies, with returns driven by earnings strength in technology and communication services. Its passive structure supports consistency with the underlying index across varying market regimes. ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has exhibited performance influenced by active security selection and the inclusion of private holdings, which can introduce additional volatility and valuation timing considerations. Relative positioning shows QQQM offering lower tracking error and cost drag, while XOVR provides differentiated exposure that may perform differently during periods of private-market appreciation or sector rotation favoring smaller or emerging innovators. Both funds respond to broader equity trends, though XOVR’s active overlay and private sleeve create distinct risk-return characteristics compared with the benchmark-tracking approach of QQQM.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) may find the tool useful for exploring related holdings and thematic ideas.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of preference to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) for most investors. The combination of a substantially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 100 holdings, passive index tracking with low turnover, and established liquidity profile provides a durable, cost-efficient framework for large-cap growth exposure. While ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) offers distinctive private-market access and active management that may appeal to specialized mandates, the higher fee structure and concentrated holdings introduce elevated cost and volatility considerations that reduce its relative attractiveness on a risk-adjusted basis across a wide range of market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQM vs. XOVR commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQM is a Hold and XOVR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQM has more net assets: 104B vs. XOVR (1.88B). QQQM has a higher annual dividend yield than XOVR: QQQM (16.441) vs XOVR (1.043). QQQM was incepted earlier than XOVR: QQQM (6 years) vs XOVR (9 years). QQQM (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XOVR (0.75). XOVR has a higher turnover QQQM (6.00) vs QQQM (6.00).
QQQMXOVRQQQM / XOVR
Gain YTD16.4411.0431,577%
Net Assets104B1.88B5,520%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.7520%
Turnover6.0066.009%
Yield0.460.00-
Fund Existence6 years9 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQMXOVR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NDOW29.300.06
+0.21%
Anydrus Advantage ETF
GJO24.50N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities
PDX21.69-0.06
-0.28%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
JRS8.49-0.03
-0.35%
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
CONI30.44-6.07
-16.61%
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF

XOVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOVR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOVR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOVR
1D Price
Change %
XOVR100%
+1.75%
HOOD - XOVR
68%
Closely correlated
+13.70%
APP - XOVR
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
NVDA - XOVR
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
TSLA - XOVR
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
ORCL - XOVR
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
More