QSR
Price
$71.84
Change
+$0.57 (+0.80%)
Updated
Dec 3, 11:28 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.79B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUMC
Price
$48.19
Change
-$0.14 (-0.29%)
Updated
Dec 3, 10:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.28B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSR vs YUMC

Header iconQSR vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$71.84
Change+$0.57 (+0.80%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization24.79B
Yum China Holdings
Price$48.19
Change-$0.14 (-0.29%)
Volume$300
Capitalization17.28B
QSR vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSR vs. YUMC commentary
Dec 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 03, 2025
Stock price -- (QSR: $71.27 vs. YUMC: $48.33)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 52% vs. YUMC: 83%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $24.79B vs. YUMC: $17.28B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $24.79B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $17.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $216.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the short-term than YUMC.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.64% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSR($24.8B) has a higher market cap than YUMC($17.3B). QSR has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: QSR (25.27) vs YUMC (20.05). QSR YTD gains are higher at: 12.476 vs. YUMC (2.431). QSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.53B vs. YUMC (1.75B). YUMC has less debt than QSR: YUMC (2.27B) vs QSR (15.9B). YUMC has higher revenues than QSR: YUMC (11.6B) vs QSR (9.26B).
QSRYUMCQSR / YUMC
Capitalization24.8B17.3B143%
EBITDA2.53B1.75B145%
Gain YTD12.4762.431513%
P/E Ratio25.2720.05126%
Revenue9.26B11.6B80%
Total Cash1.21BN/A-
Total Debt15.9B2.27B702%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
3452
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1344
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (28) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (34). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's SMR Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (52). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (47). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (44). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWN56.640.93
+1.67%
Taiwan Fund
ECNS35.41-0.14
-0.39%
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
MSFD11.42-0.08
-0.69%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
RING69.55-1.15
-1.63%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
MHNC16.65-0.57
-3.31%
MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+0.56%
YUM - YUMC
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
DPZ - YUMC
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
HDL - YUMC
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
QSR - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More