QSR
Price
$62.70
Change
-$1.17 (-1.83%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
20.44B
14 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$46.81
Change
+$2.03 (+4.53%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.75B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QSR vs YUMC

Header iconQSR vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$62.70
Change-$1.17 (-1.83%)
Volume$1.9M
Capitalization20.44B
Yum China Holdings
Price$46.81
Change+$2.03 (+4.53%)
Volume$4.26M
Capitalization16.75B
QSR vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSR vs. YUMC commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a Buy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (QSR: $62.70 vs. YUMC: $46.81)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 77% vs. YUMC: 123%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $20.44B vs. YUMC: $16.75B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $20.44B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $228.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +6.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.10% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSR($20.4B) has a higher market cap than YUMC($16.7B). YUMC (20.09) and QSR (20.08) have similar P/E ratio . YUMC YTD gains are higher at: -2.359 vs. QSR (-2.919). QSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.66B vs. YUMC (1.68B). YUMC has less debt than QSR: YUMC (2.41B) vs QSR (16B). YUMC has higher revenues than QSR: YUMC (11.3B) vs QSR (8.41B).
QSRYUMCQSR / YUMC
Capitalization20.4B16.7B122%
EBITDA2.66B1.68B159%
Gain YTD-2.919-2.359124%
P/E Ratio20.0820.09100%
Revenue8.41B11.3B74%
Total CashN/A1.84B-
Total Debt16B2.41B664%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2480
SMR RATING
1..100
2855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (32). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (80). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's SMR Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (55). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (56). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (40). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVGW28.180.43
+1.55%
Calavo Growers
DRH7.040.04
+0.57%
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
PEN278.771.55
+0.56%
Penumbra
NHPBP13.450.02
+0.12%
National Healthcare Properties Inc
ALUR2.27-0.02
-0.87%
Allurion Technologies

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+4.53%
YUM - YUMC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
QSR - YUMC
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
ARCO - YUMC
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
CNNE - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More