QTEC vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTEC is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QTEC | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CIPIX | 22.79 | 0.62 | +2.80% |
| Champlain Mid Cap Institutional | |||
| NFEPX | 18.85 | 0.49 | +2.67% |
| Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst | |||
| HSRUX | 23.74 | 0.60 | +2.59% |
| Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
| NCEGX | 19.83 | 0.39 | +2.01% |
| The North Country Large Cap Equity Fund | |||
| NZDCHF | 0.50 | N/A | N/A |
| New Zealand Dollar - Switzerland Franc | |||
QTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTEC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTEC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTEC | 100% | +3.16% | ||
| KLAC - QTEC | 85% Closely correlated | +4.62% | ||
| LRCX - QTEC | 83% Closely correlated | +4.56% | ||
| AMAT - QTEC | 83% Closely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| CDNS - QTEC | 82% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| SNPS - QTEC | 80% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +4.12% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| S - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||