QTWO
Price
$65.92
Change
-$1.69 (-2.50%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.11B
22 days until earnings call
RBBN
Price
$3.83
Change
-$0.02 (-0.52%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
679.99M
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs RBBN

Header iconQTWO vs RBBN Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs RBBNBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$65.92
Change-$1.69 (-2.50%)
Volume$21.4K
Capitalization4.11B
Ribbon Communications
Price$3.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.52%)
Volume$7.67K
Capitalization679.99M
QTWO vs RBBN Comparison Chart in %
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. RBBN commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RBBN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $65.90 vs. RBBN: $3.84)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and RBBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 80% vs. RBBN: 125%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $4.11B vs. RBBN: $679.99M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.11B. RBBN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $679.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $314.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBBN is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBBN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBBN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than RBBN.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.92% price change this week, while RBBN (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +236.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RBBN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.12B) has a higher market cap than RBBN($680M). RBBN YTD gains are higher at: -7.692 vs. QTWO (-34.526). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. RBBN (68.4M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. RBBN (60.4M). RBBN has less debt than QTWO: RBBN (409M) vs QTWO (539M). RBBN has higher revenues than QTWO: RBBN (863M) vs QTWO (743M).
QTWORBBNQTWO / RBBN
Capitalization4.12B680M605%
EBITDA77.5M68.4M113%
Gain YTD-34.526-7.692449%
P/E Ratio1098.33N/A-
Revenue743M863M86%
Total Cash532M60.4M881%
Total Debt539M409M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs RBBN: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
RBBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7265
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBBN's Valuation (47) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RBBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RBBN (95) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

RBBN's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RBBN (93) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWORBBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMAGX16.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan
QRSVX44.41N/A
N/A
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Inv
AFYDX58.58N/A
N/A
American Century Large Cap Equity Y
FLXSX17.84N/A
N/A
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index
AMAHX10.15N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Dividend A

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-2.53%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
ALKT - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
HUBS - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
More

RBBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBBN
1D Price
Change %
RBBN100%
-0.52%
SHOP - RBBN
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
QTWO - RBBN
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
ONTF - RBBN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
PCOR - RBBN
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
INTA - RBBN
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More