QTWO
Price
$69.98
Change
+$0.48 (+0.69%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.37B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBBN
Price
$2.85
Change
+$0.06 (+2.15%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
503.31M
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs RBBN

Header iconQTWO vs RBBN Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs RBBNBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$69.98
Change+$0.48 (+0.69%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization4.37B
Ribbon Communications
Price$2.85
Change+$0.06 (+2.15%)
Volume$29.08K
Capitalization503.31M
QTWO vs RBBN Comparison Chart in %
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. RBBN commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RBBN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $69.96 vs. RBBN: $2.78)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and RBBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 64% vs. RBBN: 117%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $4.37B vs. RBBN: $503.31M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.37B. RBBN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $503.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $276.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBBN is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than RBBN.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while RBBN (@Packaged Software) price change was -12.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

RBBN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-5.18% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.38B) has a higher market cap than RBBN($503M). QTWO (-30.492) and RBBN (-31.490) have similar YTD gains . QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. RBBN (70.3M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. RBBN (74.8M). RBBN has less debt than QTWO: RBBN (408M) vs QTWO (539M). RBBN has higher revenues than QTWO: RBBN (869M) vs QTWO (743M).
QTWORBBNQTWO / RBBN
Capitalization4.38B503M870%
EBITDA77.5M70.3M110%
Gain YTD-30.492-31.49097%
P/E Ratio139.92N/A-
Revenue743M869M86%
Total Cash532M74.8M711%
Total Debt539M408M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs RBBN: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
RBBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
195
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5885
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBBN's Valuation (48) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (82) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RBBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RBBN (91) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RBBN (85) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

RBBN's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWORBBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALGAX21.49N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities A
JCVVX24.33N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value R5
ATHYX29.76N/A
N/A
American Century Heritage Y
PXINX12.51-0.04
-0.32%
Impax International Sust Econ Inv
CCISX10.76-0.08
-0.74%
Calamos International Small Cap Gr C

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+0.66%
FRSH - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
PCOR - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
More

RBBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBBN
1D Price
Change %
RBBN100%
+2.15%
SHOP - RBBN
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.95%
INTA - RBBN
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
QTWO - RBBN
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
PCOR - RBBN
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
TEAM - RBBN
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More