Advertisement
QTWO vs RBBN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RBBN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RBBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QTWO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBBN’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RBBN’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while RBBN (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
RBBN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| QTWO | RBBN | QTWO / RBBN | |
| Capitalization | 4.92B | 707M | 696% |
| EBITDA | 77.5M | 68.4M | 113% |
| Gain YTD | -21.699 | -4.087 | 531% |
| P/E Ratio | 1313.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 743M | 863M | 86% |
| Total Cash | 532M | 60.4M | 881% |
| Total Debt | 539M | 409M | 132% |
QTWO | RBBN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBBN's Valuation (48) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
RBBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RBBN (94) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
RBBN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as QTWO (58) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (93) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
| QTWO | RBBN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TFOIX | 50.76 | 0.63 | +1.26% |
| Transamerica Capital Growth I | |||
| CIEQX | 13.27 | 0.06 | +0.45% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamll Intl Eq Inst | |||
| ISOPX | 18.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port A | |||
| CADPX | 21.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia International Div Inc Inst2 | |||
| TRZKX | 76.03 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price International Discovery Z | |||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | +1.99% | ||
| FRSH - QTWO | 69% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| HUBS - QTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.00% | ||
| COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| WEAV - QTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
RBBN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBBN | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| SHOP - RBBN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| DJCO - RBBN | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| PCOR - RBBN | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| ONTF - RBBN | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| QTWO - RBBN | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
More | ||||