QTWO
Price
$62.55
Change
-$0.81 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RELY
Price
$24.23
Change
+$0.62 (+2.63%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.1B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs RELY

QTWO vs RELY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Q2 Holdings (QTWO) vs. Remitly Global (RELY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Q2 Holdings (QTWO) is a B2B digital banking platform provider with $794.8 million in FY2025 revenue and a $2.7 billion contracted backlog, yet its stock has declined roughly 39% over the past year amid broader software sector repricing.
  • Remitly Global (RELY) delivered 29% revenue growth to $1.635 billion in FY2025, achieved its first full year of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) profitability, and saw its stock surge over 68% year-to-date in 2026.
  • Both companies have successfully pivoted from net losses to GAAP profitability, but operate in fundamentally different markets — QTWO serves U.S. financial institutions while RELY focuses on cross-border consumer remittances.
  • Analyst consensus currently leans more bullish on RELY (Strong Buy, with a ~30% upside to the average price target) compared to QTWO (Buy, with a ~32% upside), though both carry meaningful upside expectations relative to recent trading levels.
  • Momentum, growth trajectory, and market sentiment have diverged sharply: RELY is trading near its 52-week highs, while QTWO has been recovering from 52-week lows near $40.79 reached in late June 2026.

Introduction

Investors evaluating financial technology stocks often weigh B2B platforms against consumer-facing disruptors — and few pairings illustrate that contrast better than QTWO and RELY. Q2 Holdings provides cloud-based digital banking infrastructure to over 1,300 U.S. financial institutions, while Remitly Global operates a cross-border remittance platform serving more than 9.3 million active customers. Both companies achieved pivotal profitability milestones in FY2025, yet their stock charts tell diverging stories. This comparison examines the business models, recent performance, and market positioning of these two fintech names, offering a data-driven framework for traders and investors weighing relative opportunity against sector-specific risk.

QTWO Overview and Recent Performance

QTWO, headquartered in Austin, Texas, delivers digital banking, lending, and fraud prevention solutions to banks, credit unions, and alternative finance companies. The company's subscription-based model generates recurring revenue from long-term contracts — its average contract length exceeds five years — providing a high degree of revenue visibility. For full-year 2025, Q2 Holdings reported revenue of $794.8 million, representing 14% year-over-year growth, while swinging from a GAAP net loss of $38.5 million in 2024 to net income of $52.0 million. Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, a measure of operating profitability) reached $186.5 million, surging approximately 49% from the prior year.

Despite strengthening fundamentals, QTWO's stock has endured a challenging period. After trading above $90 per share in mid-2025, shares declined to a 52-week low of $40.79 in late June 2026 before rebounding into the mid-$50s by late July. The sell-off reflects broader pressure on software valuations, decelerating revenue growth expectations (management guided to approximately 10% revenue growth for 2026), and investor rotation away from higher-multiple names. Positively, the company's $2.7 billion contracted backlog, $145 million remaining on a share repurchase authorization, and expanding adjusted EBITDA margins — projected to reach roughly 26% in 2026 — suggest management is prioritizing profitability alongside measured top-line expansion.

RELY Overview and Recent Performance

RELY, based in Seattle, Washington, operates a digital platform for international money transfers, connecting senders to recipients across more than 5,300 corridors and over 5.4 billion bank accounts, mobile wallets, and cash pickup locations globally. FY2025 marked a breakthrough year: revenue reached $1.635 billion, up 29% year-over-year, while the company recorded its first full year of GAAP profitability with net income of $67.9 million, compared to a net loss of $37.0 million in 2024. Adjusted EBITDA nearly doubled to $272.2 million, and free cash flow surged to $283.3 million.

Unlike QTWO, RELY's stock has been on a strong upward trajectory. After starting 2026 around $13.80 per share, the stock rallied to a 52-week high above $25 by mid-July, reflecting roughly 68% year-to-date gains. Several catalysts have fueled the momentum: better-than-expected Q1 2026 results (revenue of $452.8 million, up 25%), upward guidance revisions, the appointment of former Amazon and Apple executive Sebastian Gunningham as CEO, and new product launches including the Flex send-now-pay-later service and Remitly Business for SMBs (small and medium-sized businesses). Analysts have responded favorably, with multiple firms raising price targets into the $27–$33 range. The company guided 2026 revenue to $1.94–$1.96 billion, implying 19–20% growth, alongside adjusted EBITDA of $340–$360 million.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where data-driven decision-making is increasingly critical, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated view of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in this featured section. These bots span diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend-following to high-frequency 5-minute and 15-minute strategies — and have posted annualized returns ranging from approximately 30% to over 190%, with win rates reaching as high as 90% in certain strategies. Each bot operates with distinct parameters, timeframes, and ticker sets, enabling users to explore approaches that match their own trading preferences. To discover which bots are currently leading the pack, visit Trending AI Robots and explore the strategies shaping today's market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both QTWO and RELY operate under the broad fintech umbrella, their business models expose investors to distinctly different risk-and-reward profiles. QTWO is a B2B platform business characterized by sticky, long-duration contracts and high switching costs — once a bank integrates Q2's digital banking stack, replacement becomes operationally complex. This creates a moat but also ties growth to the pace of financial institution technology budgets and digital transformation cycles, which tend to move gradually. Revenue growth has decelerated from mid-teens to roughly 10%, and the stock's P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio near 48 on trailing earnings reflects a market still pricing in a premium despite the slowdown.

RELY, by contrast, is a B2C volume-driven business where growth depends on customer acquisition, transaction frequency, and geographic corridor expansion. Active customers grew 19% to 9.3 million in FY2025, and send volume surged 37% to $74.9 billion, indicating strong organic demand. However, RELY's model is more exposed to macroeconomic variables — immigration policy shifts, foreign exchange volatility, and competition from both legacy money transfer operators and emerging digital alternatives. The stock's beta of 0.34 suggests lower volatility relative to the broader market, though the recent rally has compressed the forward P/E to approximately 15.7, making it appear less expensive on a forward basis than QTWO's forward P/E near 19.5.

On profitability, both companies have crossed into GAAP-positive territory, but RELY's adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 19% (guided for 2026) and free cash flow generation of $283 million give it a near-term edge on cash-based metrics. QTWO counters with a massive $2.7 billion backlog that provides multi-year revenue visibility, something RELY's transaction-based model cannot replicate. Sector exposure also differs: QTWO is levered to U.S. banking technology spending, while RELY is levered to global migration patterns and cross-border payment flows — two macro themes that do not always correlate.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for RELY over QTWO. The rationale centers on trend consistency and momentum differentials: RELY has sustained above-guidance revenue growth, accelerating profitability, expanding product offerings, and a stock trading near 52-week highs with constructive analyst revisions — characteristics that algorithmic trend-following models typically favor. QTWO, while fundamentally sound with a robust backlog and improving margins, has experienced a prolonged price correction that signals weaker near-term trend alignment, even if the valuation case has become more compelling. That said, probabilistic models also account for mean reversion, and QTWO's sharp discount from its 52-week high could attract AI strategies designed to identify oversold conditions. The ultimate weighting between these two names would depend on the specific AI bot's strategy, timeframe, and risk parameters — underscoring the value of exploring multiple AI-driven approaches rather than relying on a single signal.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTWO vs. RELY commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RELY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (QTWO: $62.55 vs. RELY: $24.23)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and RELY are both not notable
QTWO represents the Packaged Software, while RELY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 102% vs. RELY: 56%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.9B vs. RELY: $5.1B
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.9B. RELY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $240.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.66T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $34.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRELY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RELY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RELY is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RELY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RELY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RELY is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while RELY (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

RELY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+2.02% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RELY($5.1B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.9B). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than RELY: QTWO (44.05) vs RELY (17.43). RELY YTD gains are higher at: 75.580 vs. QTWO (-13.318). RELY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 171M vs. QTWO (152M). RELY has more cash in the bank: 649M vs. QTWO (106M). RELY (39.3M) and QTWO (40.9M) have identical debt. RELY has higher revenues than QTWO: RELY (1.73B) vs QTWO (846M).
QTWORELYQTWO / RELY
Capitalization3.9B5.1B76%
EBITDA152M171M89%
Gain YTD-13.31875.580-18%
P/E Ratio44.0517.43253%
Revenue846M1.73B49%
Total Cash106M649M16%
Total Debt40.9M39.3M104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs RELY: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
RELY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
5763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5062

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RELY's Valuation (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QTWO (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RELY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RELY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RELY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RELY (63) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RELY’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RELY (42) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RELY’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RELY (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RELY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWORELY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RELY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QPUX20.110.58
+2.97%
Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF
AGIX46.261.02
+2.25%
KraneSharesArtfclIntglcandTechPub-PvtETF
MAKX71.340.37
+0.52%
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
EWC61.770.26
+0.42%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
IOCT38.010.06
+0.16%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-1.28%
PCOR - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
ALKT - QTWO
67%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
WK - QTWO
66%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
MANH - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
WDAY - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
More