It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QTWO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.07% price change this week, while SSNC (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.19%.
QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
SSNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
QTWO | SSNC | QTWO / SSNC | |
Capitalization | 5.09B | 21.6B | 24% |
EBITDA | 77.5M | 2.1B | 4% |
Gain YTD | -17.546 | 18.304 | -96% |
P/E Ratio | 1383.17 | 28.03 | 4,935% |
Revenue | 743M | 6.05B | 12% |
Total Cash | 532M | 480M | 111% |
Total Debt | 539M | 7.02B | 8% |
QTWO | SSNC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSNC's Valuation (18) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (97). This means that SSNC’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100). This means that SSNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's SMR Rating (63) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (92). This means that SSNC’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (54). This means that SSNC’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (44). This means that SSNC’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO | SSNC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 1 day ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago45% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago71% | 11 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago73% | 3 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago48% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago43% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
USAI | 39.42 | 0.33 | +0.84% |
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | |||
QQQS | 31.87 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
PSP | 71.61 | 0.05 | +0.07% |
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | |||
PALD | 22.43 | N/A | N/A |
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares | |||
NVDY | 15.65 | -0.40 | -2.49% |
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QTWO | 100% | +1.78% | ||
FRSH - QTWO | 69% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
ALKT - QTWO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
HUBS - QTWO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
WEAV - QTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSNC has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSNC jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SSNC | 100% | +0.44% | ||
CPAY - SSNC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
ADP - SSNC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
DOX - SSNC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
EEFT - SSNC | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
ROP - SSNC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More |