QTWO
Price
$62.26
Change
+$1.07 (+1.75%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.89B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TRAK
Price
$15.67
Change
+$0.15 (+0.97%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
286.51M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs TRAK

Header iconQTWO vs TRAK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs TRAKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$62.26
Change+$1.07 (+1.75%)
Volume$650.06K
Capitalization3.89B
ReposiTrak
Price$15.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.97%)
Volume$40.3K
Capitalization286.51M
QTWO vs TRAK Comparison Chart in %
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. TRAK commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and TRAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $62.26 vs. TRAK: $15.67)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and TRAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 49% vs. TRAK: 66%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.89B vs. TRAK: $286.51M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.89B. TRAK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $286.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $315.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRAK is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRAK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both QTWO and TRAK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.01% price change this week, while TRAK (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TRAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.78% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($3.89B) has a higher market cap than TRAK($287M). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than TRAK: QTWO (1037.67) vs TRAK (44.77). TRAK YTD gains are higher at: -28.978 vs. QTWO (-38.142). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. TRAK (8.62M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. TRAK (28.1M). TRAK has less debt than QTWO: TRAK (778K) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than TRAK: QTWO (743M) vs TRAK (22M).
QTWOTRAKQTWO / TRAK
Capitalization3.89B287M1,355%
EBITDA77.5M8.62M899%
Gain YTD-38.142-28.978132%
P/E Ratio1037.6744.772,318%
Revenue743M22M3,377%
Total Cash532M28.1M1,893%
Total Debt539M778K69,280%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs TRAK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
TRAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
9259
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9085
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TRAK (50) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to TRAK’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's SMR Rating (59) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's Price Growth Rating (85) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TRAK (86) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to TRAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOTRAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMVHY10.920.11
+1.03%
ENTAIN PLC
LEKOF0.01N/A
N/A
Lekoil Ltd
SNFRF0.20N/A
N/A
Sinofert Holdings, Ltd.
VOLAF29.49N/A
N/A
Volvo AB
FTCO4.50-0.04
-0.83%
Fortitude Gold Corporation

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with ALKT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ALKT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.75%
ALKT - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
FRSH - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
HUBS - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+9.82%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
More

TRAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRAK has been loosely correlated with INTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRAK jumps, then INTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAK
1D Price
Change %
TRAK100%
+0.97%
INTA - TRAK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
ADSK - TRAK
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
PATH - TRAK
45%
Loosely correlated
+6.74%
ONTF - TRAK
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
DJCO - TRAK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More