QTWO
Price
$90.78
Change
+$1.55 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jul 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.1B
One day until earnings call
TRAK
Price
$18.27
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jul 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
296.09M
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs TRAK

Header iconQTWO vs TRAK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs TRAKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$90.78
Change+$1.55 (+1.74%)
Volume$5.95K
Capitalization3.1B
ReposiTrak
Price$18.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$500
Capitalization296.09M
QTWO vs TRAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. TRAK commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Buy and TRAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $90.75 vs. TRAK: $18.20)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and TRAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 90% vs. TRAK: 45%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.1B vs. TRAK: $296.09M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.1B. TRAK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $296.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRAK is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than TRAK.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while TRAK (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

TRAK is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.66% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($3.11B) has a higher market cap than TRAK($296M). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -9.836 vs. TRAK (-17.611). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. TRAK (7.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. TRAK (23.3M). TRAK has less debt than QTWO: TRAK (593K) vs QTWO (549M). QTWO has higher revenues than TRAK: QTWO (625M) vs TRAK (19.8M).
QTWOTRAKQTWO / TRAK
Capitalization3.11B296M1,049%
EBITDA15.6M7.6M205%
Gain YTD-9.836-17.61156%
P/E RatioN/A56.07-
Revenue625M19.8M3,157%
Total Cash324M23.3M1,391%
Total Debt549M593K92,580%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs TRAK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
TRAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9519
SMR RATING
1..100
9058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10076
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRAK's Valuation (22) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (54) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's SMR Rating (58) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TRAK (63) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to TRAK’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOTRAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIRDF20.980.07
+0.32%
Bird Construction Inc.
MAQAF3.49N/A
N/A
Atlas Arteria Ltd.
ZPHYF0.03N/A
N/A
Zephyr Minerals Ltd
NRDBY14.61-0.30
-2.01%
Nordea Bank Abp
LMRXF0.41-0.04
-8.42%
Laramide Resources Ltd.

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.70%
FRSH - QTWO
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
ALKT - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
ADSK - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
HUBS - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

TRAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRAK has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRAK jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAK
1D Price
Change %
TRAK100%
-0.33%
PAR - TRAK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
INTA - TRAK
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
DJCO - TRAK
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
QTWO - TRAK
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
ADSK - TRAK
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
More