Ad is loading...
QUBT
Price
$3.10
Change
-$1.30 (-29.55%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
129 days until earnings call
TSHTY
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

QUBT vs TSHTY

Header iconQUBT vs TSHTY Comparison
Open Charts QUBT vs TSHTYBanner chart's image
Quantum Computing
Price$3.10
Change-$1.30 (-29.55%)
Volume$53.36M
CapitalizationN/A
Toshiba Tec
Price$11.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$201
CapitalizationN/A
QUBT vs TSHTY Comparison Chart
Loading...
QUBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUBT vs. TSHTY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUBT is a Sell and TSHTY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (QUBT: $3.10 vs. TSHTY: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: QUBT and TSHTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUBT: 532% vs. TSHTY: 103%
Market capitalization -- QUBT: $75.1M vs. TSHTY: $1.62B
QUBT [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $75.1M. TSHTY’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $262.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $9.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSHTY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSHTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSHTY is a better buy in the long-term than QUBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QUBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QUBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

QUBT (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +116.78% price change this week, while TSHTY (@Computer Peripherals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

QUBT is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (+1.66% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSHTY($1.62B) has a higher market cap than QUBT($75.1M). QUBT YTD gains are higher at: 239.503 vs. TSHTY (-13.422). TSHTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.11B vs. QUBT (-35.07M). TSHTY has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. QUBT (7.38M). QUBT has less debt than TSHTY: QUBT (5.67M) vs TSHTY (1.98B). TSHTY has higher revenues than QUBT: TSHTY (491B) vs QUBT (284K).
QUBTTSHTYQUBT / TSHTY
Capitalization75.1M1.62B5%
EBITDA-35.07M4.11B-1%
Gain YTD239.503-13.422-1,784%
P/E RatioN/A400.00-
Revenue284K491B0%
Total Cash7.38M32.4B0%
Total Debt5.67M1.98B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUBT vs TSHTY: Fundamental Ratings
QUBT
TSHTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSHTY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QUBT (93). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew significantly faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

TSHTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBT (100). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

TSHTY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBT (95). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew similarly to QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

QUBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TSHTY (57). This means that QUBT’s stock grew similarly to TSHTY’s over the last 12 months.

TSHTY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUBT (100). This means that TSHTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QUBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QUBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGRM2.050.04
+1.99%
Monogram Orthopaedics
RGP8.34-0.12
-1.42%
Resources Connection
EXLS44.69-0.73
-1.61%
ExlService Holdings
IBM204.99-4.00
-1.91%
International Business Machines Corp
THRM42.33-0.95
-2.20%
Gentherm

QUBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been loosely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBT
1D Price
Change %
QUBT100%
-29.55%
QBTS - QUBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-12.30%
RGTI - QUBT
40%
Loosely correlated
-9.03%
IONQ - QUBT
34%
Loosely correlated
+11.39%
SSYS - QUBT
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
CAN - QUBT
27%
Poorly correlated
+11.49%
More

TSHTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSHTY and IONQ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSHTY and IONQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSHTY
1D Price
Change %
TSHTY100%
N/A
IONQ - TSHTY
23%
Poorly correlated
+11.39%
CRSR - TSHTY
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
LNVGY - TSHTY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
QUBT - TSHTY
12%
Poorly correlated
-29.55%
SEKEY - TSHTY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More