QULL
Price
$78.51
Change
+$13.41 (+20.60%)
Updated
Jun 22, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UDOW
Price
$70.09
Change
+$0.52 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Net Assets
867.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QULL vs UDOW

QULL vs UDOW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) vs. ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW)

Key Takeaways

  • QULL provides 2x leveraged exposure to a sector-neutral basket of large- and mid-cap U.S. quality stocks, while UDOW delivers 3x daily exposure to the 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average.
  • Both products carry a 0.95% expense ratio, yet QULL is structured as an exchange-traded note (ETN) with counterparty risk, whereas UDOW is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) using derivatives for leverage.
  • QULL emphasizes high-quality characteristics such as profitability, low debt, and earnings stability across sectors; UDOW concentrates on established blue-chip companies with heavy weightings in financials, industrials, and technology.
  • Structural differences in leverage magnitude and underlying index construction create distinct risk-return profiles, with UDOW exhibiting higher daily volatility due to its 3x multiplier.
  • Both funds suit tactical, short-term trading strategies rather than long-term buy-and-hold portfolios because of compounding effects and leverage decay in volatile markets.
  • Investors comparing the two must weigh QULL’s quality-factor tilt against UDOW’s broader large-cap cyclical exposure within the current environment of sector rotation and interest-rate sensitivity.

Introduction

Exchange-traded products offering leveraged exposure to U.S. equities have grown in popularity among traders seeking amplified returns. QULL and UDOW represent two distinct leveraged approaches: one targeting quality characteristics and the other tracking a well-known blue-chip index. They do not compete directly but serve investors pursuing magnified equity exposure through different factor and index lenses. This comparison highlights structural distinctions, sector profiles, and positioning considerations for market participants evaluating leveraged strategies.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) Overview

QULL is an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by UBS that seeks to deliver twice the compounded quarterly performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, net of fees and financing costs. The underlying index selects large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks exhibiting strong quality traits—such as high return on equity, stable earnings growth, and low financial leverage—while maintaining sector neutrality relative to the parent MSCI USA Index. As an ETN, QULL carries issuer credit risk rather than direct ownership of securities. It features an annual tracking fee of 0.95% plus variable financing costs tied to short-term rates. The product typically holds exposure to several hundred names through the index methodology, with allocations spread across quality leaders in technology, healthcare, consumer staples, and financials.

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) Overview

UDOW is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) from ProShares that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The Dow comprises 30 large, price-weighted blue-chip companies spanning financials, industrials, technology, healthcare, consumer discretionary, and energy sectors. UDOW achieves its leverage through a combination of swaps, futures, and other derivatives, resulting in an effective holding count that includes the underlying swaps and ancillary instruments. The fund maintains a gross and net expense ratio of 0.95%. Top exposures frequently include names such as Goldman Sachs, Caterpillar, and other Dow constituents, with sector weights reflecting the index’s emphasis on cyclical and value-oriented large caps.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both products operate within the broader U.S. large-cap equity market, influenced by macroeconomic factors including Federal Reserve policy, corporate earnings trends, and sector rotation between growth and value styles. Quality-focused strategies have historically performed well during periods of economic uncertainty or rising rates, as companies with strong balance sheets tend to exhibit resilience. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, by contrast, captures established industrial and financial leaders sensitive to economic cycles, commodity prices, and global trade dynamics. Recent capital flows into leveraged products reflect ongoing investor interest in tactical amplification amid evolving interest-rate expectations and corporate earnings cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QULL’s 2x quality exposure has provided a buffer during defensive rotations, as high-quality names often demonstrate lower drawdowns relative to broad indexes. UDOW’s 3x multiplier amplifies moves in the Dow, leading to greater sensitivity to swings in financials, industrials, and technology. Relative positioning favors QULL for investors seeking factor-based diversification within leverage, while UDOW appeals to those targeting concentrated blue-chip momentum. Volatility differences arise primarily from the leverage ratios and index construction, with both products experiencing amplified effects from compounding over multi-day periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor QULL on a probabilistic basis due to its sector-neutral quality construction, which may offer more consistent exposure characteristics across market regimes compared with UDOW’s higher 3x leverage on a narrower 30-stock index. The quality-factor emphasis and lower leverage magnitude provide a relatively balanced risk profile within the leveraged category, though both products remain suited primarily for short-term tactical use.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QULL vs. UDOW commentary
Jul 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QULL is a Hold and UDOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UDOW has more net assets: 867M vs. QULL (40.9M). UDOW has a higher annual dividend yield than QULL: UDOW (21.757) vs QULL (14.572). QULL was incepted earlier than UDOW: QULL (5 years) vs UDOW (16 years).
QULLUDOWQULL / UDOW
Gain YTD14.57221.75767%
Net Assets40.9M867M5%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.95-
TurnoverN/A24.00-
Yield0.001.19-
Fund Existence5 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QULLUDOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QULL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UDOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCWX86.010.79
+0.93%
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
LMVFX134.36N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Value FI
GSLAX17.94N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
WSMDX31.27N/A
N/A
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth I
ASCFX30.10N/A
N/A
Virtus Small-Cap R6

UDOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UDOW and AXP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UDOW and AXP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UDOW
1D Price
Change %
UDOW100%
+0.75%
AXP - UDOW
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
GS - UDOW
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
JPM - UDOW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
MMM - UDOW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
KD - UDOW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More