It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QXO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QXO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
QXO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while SMAR (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.25%.
QXO is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
SMAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
QXO | SMAR | QXO / SMAR | |
Capitalization | 70.1M | 5.29B | 1% |
EBITDA | -185.11K | -93.27M | 0% |
Gain YTD | -86.734 | 17.043 | -509% |
P/E Ratio | 35.46 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 54.5M | 958M | 6% |
Total Cash | 6.14M | 629M | 1% |
Total Debt | 2.62M | 49.8M | 5% |
QXO | SMAR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QXO's Valuation (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SMAR (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QXO’s stock grew similarly to SMAR’s over the last 12 months.
SMAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QXO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SMAR’s stock grew similarly to QXO’s over the last 12 months.
QXO's SMR Rating (89) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SMAR (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QXO’s stock grew similarly to SMAR’s over the last 12 months.
SMAR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QXO (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SMAR’s stock grew similarly to QXO’s over the last 12 months.
QXO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QXO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAR’s over the last 12 months.
QXO | SMAR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago87% | 5 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 8 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QXO has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QXO jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QXO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QXO | 100% | -2.01% | ||
CYN - QXO | 40% Loosely correlated | +49.29% | ||
MLGO - QXO | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
SMAR - QXO | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
CCSI - QXO | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
SMRT - QXO | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAR has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAR jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMAR | 100% | -0.07% | ||
COIN - SMAR | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
CLSK - SMAR | 57% Loosely correlated | -7.90% | ||
RIOT - SMAR | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
COMP - SMAR | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
HOOD - SMAR | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More |