Advertisement
R vs SEZL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is R is a Hold and SEZL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
R’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- R’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SEZL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
R’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- R’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SEZL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -5.39% price change this week, while SEZL (@Savings Banks) price change was -7.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.76%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
R is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SEZL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-4.34% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Savings Banks (-1.71% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| R | SEZL | R / SEZL | |
| Capitalization | 9.58B | 4.01B | 239% |
| EBITDA | 3.31B | 183M | 1,808% |
| Gain YTD | 31.559 | 87.649 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.30 | 26.12 | 78% |
| Revenue | 12.9B | 481M | 2,682% |
| Total Cash | 219M | 120M | 183% |
| Total Debt | 8.45B | 145M | 5,830% |
R | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| R | SEZL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 20 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FBCG | 61.53 | 0.27 | +0.44% |
| Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |||
| IVVM | 37.69 | 0.05 | +0.13% |
| iShares Large Cap Moderate Qt Ldrd ETF | |||
| PCIG | 9.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Polen Capital International Growth ETF | |||
| LVHD | 44.38 | -0.17 | -0.38% |
| Franklin U.S. Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| VRTL | 28.41 | -0.48 | -1.68% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | |||
R and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, R has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if R jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
SEZL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEZL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEZL | 100% | +1.44% | ||
| AFRM - SEZL | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| UPST - SEZL | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.99% | ||
| URI - SEZL | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AER - SEZL | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| R - SEZL | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||