RBCN
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.20 (-8.70%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.47M
43 days until earnings call
SQNS
Price
$1.47
Change
+$0.19 (+14.84%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
37.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBCN vs SQNS

Header iconRBCN vs SQNS Comparison
Open Charts RBCN vs SQNSBanner chart's image
Rubicon Technology
Price$2.10
Change-$0.20 (-8.70%)
Volume$528
Capitalization3.47M
Sequans Communications S.A
Price$1.47
Change+$0.19 (+14.84%)
Volume$1.29M
Capitalization37.51M
RBCN vs SQNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SQNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBCN vs. SQNS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBCN is a Hold and SQNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (RBCN: $2.10 vs. SQNS: $1.47)
Brand notoriety: RBCN and SQNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBCN: 23% vs. SQNS: 276%
Market capitalization -- RBCN: $3.47M vs. SQNS: $37.51M
RBCN [@Semiconductors] is valued at $3.47M. SQNS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $37.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.85T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $59.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBCN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQNS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RBCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQNS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SQNS is a better buy in the long-term than RBCN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SQNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SQNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RBCN (@Semiconductors) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while SQNS (@Semiconductors) price change was -11.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBCN is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

SQNS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.49% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQNS($37.5M) has a higher market cap than RBCN($3.47M). RBCN has higher P/E ratio than SQNS: RBCN (21.14) vs SQNS (0.67). RBCN YTD gains are higher at: 27.273 vs. SQNS (-57.880). SQNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. RBCN (387K). SQNS has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. RBCN (1.12M). RBCN has less debt than SQNS: RBCN (1.58M) vs SQNS (11M). SQNS has higher revenues than RBCN: SQNS (38.9M) vs RBCN (3.31M).
RBCNSQNSRBCN / SQNS
Capitalization3.47M37.5M9%
EBITDA387K149M0%
Gain YTD27.273-57.880-47%
P/E Ratio21.140.673,150%
Revenue3.31M38.9M8%
Total Cash1.12M45.9M2%
Total Debt1.58M11M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBCN vs SQNS: Fundamental Ratings
RBCN
SQNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30100
SMR RATING
1..100
9510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3765
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
419
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SQNS's Valuation (32) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBCN (88) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SQNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBCN’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQNS (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew significantly faster than SQNS’s over the last 12 months.

SQNS's SMR Rating (10) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBCN (95) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SQNS’s stock grew significantly faster than RBCN’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SQNS (65) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew similarly to SQNS’s over the last 12 months.

RBCN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SQNS (19) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RBCN’s stock grew similarly to SQNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SQNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SQNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLI0.16N/A
+2.49%
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp
BMRC22.840.14
+0.62%
Bank of Marin Bancorp
ESGR336.360.33
+0.10%
Enstar Group Limited
MSCI576.740.33
+0.06%
MSCI
MOMO8.44-0.10
-1.17%
Hello Group

RBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBCN and MU have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBCN and MU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBCN
1D Price
Change %
RBCN100%
-8.70%
MU - RBCN
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
SQNS - RBCN
14%
Poorly correlated
+14.83%
SIMO - RBCN
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
DIOD - RBCN
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MCHP - RBCN
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

SQNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQNS and ICHR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQNS and ICHR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQNS
1D Price
Change %
SQNS100%
+14.83%
ICHR - SQNS
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
DVLT - SQNS
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
AXTI - SQNS
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
IPGP - SQNS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
MXL - SQNS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More