Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCEEX vs WMMRX
RCEEX vs WMMRX Comparison
Open Charts RCEEX vs WMMRX
RCEEX vs WMMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCEEX vs. WMMRX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCEEX is a Buy and WMMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. WMMRX (460M). WMMRX pays higher dividends than RCEEX: WMMRX (6.07) vs RCEEX (2.25). RCEEX was incepted earlier than WMMRX: RCEEX (12 years) vs WMMRX (21 years). WMMRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RCEEX (1.06). RCEEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMMRX (7.00). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMRX: RCEEX (250) vs WMMRX (1000). WMMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.08 vs. RCEEX (12.44). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.55 vs. WMMRX (32.21).
| RCEEX | WMMRX | RCEEX / WMMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.00 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.37 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.337 | 16.297 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25 | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 460M | 27,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 6.07 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 23.08 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 38.78 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.55 | 32.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.37 | 70.00 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement