Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCEEX vs WMMRX
RCEEX vs WMMRX Comparison
Open Charts RCEEX vs WMMRX
RCEEX vs WMMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCEEX vs. WMMRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCEEX is a Hold and WMMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. WMMRX (472M). WMMRX pays higher dividends than RCEEX: WMMRX (5.95) vs RCEEX (2.24). RCEEX was incepted earlier than WMMRX: RCEEX (12 years) vs WMMRX (21 years). WMMRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RCEEX (1.06). RCEEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMMRX (7.00). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMRX: RCEEX (250) vs WMMRX (1000). WMMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.77 vs. RCEEX (7.15). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. WMMRX (32.46).
| RCEEX | WMMRX | RCEEX / WMMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.99 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.772 | 17.073 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25 | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 472M | 27,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 5.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 20.77 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.46 | 42.92 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | 32.46 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.87 | 72.23 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers