Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCLIX vs RWMFX
RCLIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RCLIX vs RWMFX
RCLIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCLIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCLIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RCLIX (17.9B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RCLIX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RCLIX (0.52). RCLIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RCLIX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RCLIX (0.57) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RCLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.40 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCLIX: RWMFX (250) vs RCLIX (500000). RCLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.70 vs. RWMFX (8.15). RCLIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. RWMFX (27.55).
| RCLIX | RWMFX | RCLIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.31 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.31 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.816 | 1.616 | 484% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 218B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.40 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.70 | 8.15 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.77 | 30.58 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.20 | 27.55 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement