Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCMTX vs TRRNX
RCMTX vs TRRNX Comparison
Open Charts RCMTX vs TRRNX
RCMTX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCMTX vs. TRRNX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCMTX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. TRRNX (12.1B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: TRRNX (1.12) vs RCMTX (0.23). RCMTX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: RCMTX (17 years) vs TRRNX (20 years). RCMTX (1.02) is less costly to investors than TRRNX (0.63). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. RCMTX (9.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRNX: RCMTX (250) vs TRRNX (2500). TRRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. RCMTX (7.93). TRRNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.15 vs. RCMTX (24.56).
| RCMTX | TRRNX | RCMTX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.003 | 13.149 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.9B | 12.1B | 264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.12 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | 14.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.42 | 55.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 29.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.58 | 114.10 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers