Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCMTX vs TRRNX
RCMTX vs TRRNX Comparison
Open Charts RCMTX vs TRRNX
RCMTX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCMTX vs. TRRNX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCMTX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. TRRNX (12.2B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: TRRNX (1.15) vs RCMTX (0.24). RCMTX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: RCMTX (16 years) vs TRRNX (19 years). RCMTX (1.02) is less costly to investors than TRRNX (0.63). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. RCMTX (9.00). RCMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRNX: RCMTX (250) vs TRRNX (2500). TRRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.44 vs. RCMTX (15.16). TRRNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. RCMTX (27.13).
| RCMTX | TRRNX | RCMTX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.706 | 10.246 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1B | 12.2B | 263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.16 | 19.44 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.54 | 53.41 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.13 | 29.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.54 | 118.62 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers