Ad is loading...
RDCCX vs RMEBX
RDCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$7.56
Change+$0.49 (+6.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.85M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
RDCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. RDCCX (154M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs RDCCX (0.69). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RMEBX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.38 vs. RDCCX (-15.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. RDCCX (2.00).
| RDCCX | RMEBX | RDCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.07 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.07 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.138 | -7.747 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.57 | -4.38 | 356% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.04 | -1.07 | 1,586% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.00 | 44.36 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.25 | 44.99 | -45% |