Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RWMHX
RDCCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RWMHX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$8.67
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.54M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.12
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
RDCCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. RDCCX (175M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RWMHX (1.33) vs RDCCX (0.63). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RWMHX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. RDCCX (-5.12). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. RDCCX (5.05).
| RDCCX | RWMHX | RDCCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.41 | 434% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.41 | 478% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.011 | 8.808 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | 4.48 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 29.53 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.05 | 44.42 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.43 | 71.77 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement