Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RWMHX
RDCCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RWMHX
RDCCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RDCCX (221M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RWMHX (1.33) vs RDCCX (0.47). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RDCCX (18 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). RDCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RWMHX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RDCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. RWMHX (1.96). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. RDCCX (-4.40).
| RDCCX | RWMHX | RDCCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.41 | 434% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.41 | 473% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.522 | 4.436 | 530% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | 1.96 | 774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.65 | 29.79 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | 26.83 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.49 | 81.23 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers