Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGAHX
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGAHX
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. RDLCX (307M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: RDLCX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGAHX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. RDLCX (-1.74). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. RDLCX (-12.40).
| RDLCX | RGAHX | RDLCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.040 | 9.200 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.74 | 0.18 | -968% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.90 | 43.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.40 | 13.78 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.49 | 106.68 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement