Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGAHX
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGAHX
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RDLCX (317M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: RDLCX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGAHX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RDLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. RGAHX (4.43). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. RDLCX (-8.30).
| RDLCX | RGAHX | RDLCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.44 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.154 | 7.244 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 4.43 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.70 | 39.88 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.30 | 16.49 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.45 | 102.84 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers