Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDWBX vs RNWFX
RDWBX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts RDWBX vs RNWFX
RDWBX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDWBX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDWBX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RDWBX (2.73B). RDWBX (1.20) and RNWFX (1.20) have matching dividends . RDWBX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: RDWBX (12 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RDWBX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RDWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RDWBX (250) and RNWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.92 vs. RNWFX (28.87). RDWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. RNWFX (20.67).
| RDWBX | RNWFX | RDWBX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.62 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.62 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.569 | 17.340 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.92 | 28.87 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.06 | 52.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.71 | 20.67 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.15 | 129.80 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement