Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDWHX vs RNWBX
RDWHX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts RDWHX vs RNWBX
RDWHX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDWHX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDWHX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RDWHX (2.73B). RDWHX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: RDWHX (1.91) vs RNWBX (0.41). RDWHX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: RDWHX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RDWHX (0.94). RDWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RDWHX (250) and RNWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.66 vs. RNWBX (26.72). RDWHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.54 vs. RNWBX (14.77).
| RDWHX | RNWBX | RDWHX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.66 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.66 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.710 | 16.263 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.41 | 461% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.66 | 26.72 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.30 | 46.29 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.54 | 14.77 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.58 | 115.61 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement