Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDWHX vs RNWBX
RDWHX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts RDWHX vs RNWBX
RDWHX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDWHX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDWHX is a Hold and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. RDWHX (2.64B). RDWHX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: RDWHX (1.58) vs RNWBX (0.41). RDWHX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: RDWHX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RDWHX (0.94). RDWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RDWHX (250) and RNWBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.05 vs. RNWBX (19.70). RDWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.49 vs. RNWBX (11.62).
| RDWHX | RNWBX | RDWHX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.66 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.66 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.981 | 15.665 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.41 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.05 | 19.70 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.67 | 47.31 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.49 | 11.62 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.79 | 98.35 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement