Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDWHX vs RNWHX
RDWHX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts RDWHX vs RNWHX
RDWHX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDWHX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDWHX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RDWHX (2.73B). RDWHX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: RDWHX (1.91) vs RNWHX (1.15). RDWHX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: RDWHX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RDWHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RDWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RDWHX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.66 vs. RNWHX (27.71). RDWHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.54 vs. RNWHX (19.35).
| RDWHX | RNWHX | RDWHX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.72 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.710 | 16.393 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.15 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.66 | 27.71 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.30 | 50.46 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.54 | 19.35 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.58 | 125.00 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement