Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SPTM
RECS vs SPTM Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SPTM
RECS vs SPTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SPTM commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and SPTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPTM has more net assets: 13.7B vs. RECS (5.72B). SPTM has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SPTM (10.524) vs RECS (5.901). RECS was incepted earlier than SPTM: RECS (7 years) vs SPTM (26 years). SPTM (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover SPTM (2.00) vs SPTM (2.00).
| RECS | SPTM | RECS / SPTM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.901 | 10.524 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 5.72B | 13.7B | 42% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.03 | 500% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 2.00 | 1,600% |
| Yield | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NDAA | 23.97 | 0.28 | +1.18% |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF | |||
| FRA | 10.87 | 0.09 | +0.83% |
| Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund | |||
| IFED | 44.90 | 0.33 | +0.75% |
| ETRACS IFED Inv with the Fd TR ETN | |||
| FNDC | 49.77 | 0.08 | +0.16% |
| Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF | |||
| BILT | 27.77 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||