Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs WLTG
RECS vs WLTG Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs WLTG
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.81
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
Volume$419.89K
Net Assets3.42B
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Price$33.09
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
Volume$5.48K
Net Assets58.06M
RECS vs WLTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. WLTG commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and WLTG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.42B vs. WLTG (58.1M). WLTG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: WLTG (13.355) vs RECS (12.103). RECS was incepted earlier than WLTG: RECS (6 years) vs WLTG (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than WLTG (0.75). WLTG has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | WLTG | RECS / WLTG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.103 | 13.355 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 58.1M | 5,885% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.75 | 20% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 113.30 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.02 | 2,564% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | WLTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
WLTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLTG has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLTG jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLTG | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| AVGO - WLTG | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| MCHP - WLTG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| HLT - WLTG | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CAT - WLTG | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| AMAT - WLTG | 56% Loosely correlated | -14.07% | ||
More | ||||