Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs WLTG
RECS vs WLTG Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs WLTG
RECS vs WLTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. WLTG commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and WLTG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.93B vs. WLTG (81.3M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than WLTG: RECS (8.178) vs WLTG (7.611). RECS was incepted earlier than WLTG: RECS (7 years) vs WLTG (5 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than WLTG (0.74). WLTG has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| RECS | WLTG | RECS / WLTG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.178 | 7.611 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 5.93B | 81.3M | 7,289% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.74 | 20% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 185.61 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.38 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | WLTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 6 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
WLTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLTG has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLTG jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLTG | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| AVGO - WLTG | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| MCHP - WLTG | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.92% | ||
| HLT - WLTG | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| CAT - WLTG | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| AMAT - WLTG | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.50% | ||
More | ||||