RECT
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.05 (-2.43%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVV
Price
$7.82
Change
-$0.06 (-0.76%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RECT vs SVV

Header iconRECT vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts RECT vs SVVBanner chart's image
Rectitude Holdings
Price$2.01
Change-$0.05 (-2.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization30.31M
Savers Value Village
Price$7.82
Change-$0.06 (-0.76%)
Volume$8.18K
Capitalization1.22B
RECT vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
RECT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RECT vs. SVV commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECT is a Hold and SVV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (RECT: $2.09 vs. SVV: $7.82)
Brand notoriety: RECT and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RECT: 2% vs. SVV: 45%
Market capitalization -- RECT: $30.31M vs. SVV: $1.22B
RECT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $30.31M. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $46.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RECT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RECT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RECT and SVV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RECT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RECT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RECT is a better buy in the short-term than SVV.

Price Growth

RECT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.96% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVV($1.22B) has a higher market cap than RECT($30.3M). SVV has higher P/E ratio than RECT: SVV (66.15) vs RECT (17.02). SVV YTD gains are higher at: -23.707 vs. RECT (-69.279).
RECTSVVRECT / SVV
Capitalization30.3M1.22B2%
EBITDAN/A146M-
Gain YTD-69.279-23.707292%
P/E Ratio17.0266.1526%
RevenueN/A1.62B-
Total CashN/A63.5M-
Total DebtN/A1.37B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RECTSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RECT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBCI40.610.36
+0.89%
Glacier Bancorp
TT406.83-0.21
-0.05%
Trane Technologies plc
BV11.85-0.04
-0.34%
BrightView Holdings
CVRX9.16-0.08
-0.92%
CVRx
NTZ2.62-0.05
-1.87%
Natuzzi SpA

RECT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RECT and FTEL have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RECT and FTEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RECT
1D Price
Change %
RECT100%
+1.46%
FTEL - RECT
12%
Poorly correlated
-11.65%
HTLM - RECT
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
SVV - RECT
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
JBDI - RECT
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
PTLE - RECT
0%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with HVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then HVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
-0.76%
HVT - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
GPI - SVV
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
LOW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.03%
HD - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
ABG - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More