RECT
Price
$3.62
Change
+$0.10 (+2.84%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.49M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SVV
Price
$12.49
Change
-$0.12 (-0.95%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RECT vs SVV

Header iconRECT vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts RECT vs SVVBanner chart's image
Rectitude Holdings
Price$3.62
Change+$0.10 (+2.84%)
Volume$3.06K
Capitalization52.49M
Savers Value Village
Price$12.49
Change-$0.12 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization1.94B
RECT vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
RECT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RECT vs. SVV commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECT is a Hold and SVV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RECT: $3.62 vs. SVV: $12.49)
Brand notoriety: RECT and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RECT: 21% vs. SVV: 83%
Market capitalization -- RECT: $52.49M vs. SVV: $1.94B
RECT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $52.49M. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RECT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RECT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the long-term than RECT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RECT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RECT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the short-term than RECT.

Price Growth

RECT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.97% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVV is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.11% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVV($1.94B) has a higher market cap than RECT($52.5M). SVV has higher P/E ratio than RECT: SVV (62.45) vs RECT (29.31). SVV YTD gains are higher at: 21.854 vs. RECT (-46.790).
RECTSVVRECT / SVV
Capitalization52.5M1.94B3%
EBITDAN/A199M-
Gain YTD-46.79021.854-214%
P/E Ratio29.3162.4547%
RevenueN/A1.58B-
Total CashN/A70.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.33B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RECTSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RECT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEOHX18.53N/A
N/A
Voya Large Cap Growth Port I
IEVAX13.75N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Value A
MVGAX18.51N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity A
QMGIX13.57N/A
N/A
Invesco Advantage International R6
EISMX38.86N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap I

RECT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RECT and ABLV have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RECT and ABLV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RECT
1D Price
Change %
RECT100%
+2.84%
ABLV - RECT
11%
Poorly correlated
+7.13%
SVV - RECT
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
FTEL - RECT
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.54%
ZOOZ - RECT
-0%
Poorly correlated
-8.47%
JBDI - RECT
-2%
Poorly correlated
-6.91%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with HVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then HVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
-0.95%
HVT - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
ARHS - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
GPI - SVV
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
LOW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
RH - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
More