Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMAX vs RNWAX
REMAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts REMAX vs RNWAX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets A
Price$20.64
Change-$0.17 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.45M
American Funds New World R1
Price$91.07
Change-$0.30 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
REMAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMAX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. REMAX (835M). REMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: REMAX (1.83) vs RNWAX (0.00). REMAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: REMAX (19 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than REMAX (1.56). REMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). REMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: REMAX (0) vs RNWAX (250). REMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. RNWAX (11.50). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.36 vs. REMAX (20.07).
| REMAX | RNWAX | REMAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.66 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.626 | 23.686 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 11.50 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.94 | 54.36 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.07 | 25.36 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.49 | 86.11 | 56% |