Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMAX vs RNWAX
REMAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts REMAX vs RNWAX
REMAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMAX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REMAX (1.27B). REMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: REMAX (1.38) vs RNWAX (0.49). REMAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: REMAX (19 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than REMAX (1.54). REMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). REMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: REMAX (0) vs RNWAX (250). REMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.01 vs. RNWAX (18.14). REMAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.40 vs. RNWAX (6.40).
| REMAX | RNWAX | REMAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.66 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.66 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.073 | 9.430 | 245% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.49 | 284% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.01 | 18.14 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.25 | 41.80 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.40 | 6.40 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.15 | 99.72 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement