Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMAX vs RNWFX
REMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMAX vs RNWFX
REMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REMAX (1.21B). REMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: REMAX (1.40) vs RNWFX (1.19). REMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMAX (19 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). REMAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). REMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). REMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMAX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.82 vs. RNWFX (20.53). REMAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.45 vs. RNWFX (15.04).
| REMAX | RNWFX | REMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.62 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.435 | 13.684 | 157% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.19 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.82 | 20.53 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.68 | 48.44 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.45 | 15.04 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.75 | 117.29 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers