Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWBX
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWBX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets S
Price$19.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets767.2M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. REMSX (767M). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMSX (2.20) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than REMSX (1.31). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RNWBX (11.99). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.24 vs. REMSX (10.38).
| REMSX | RNWBX | REMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.67 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.092 | 17.879 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 767M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.13 | 1,703% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 11.99 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 36.12 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.38 | 18.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.36 | 81.10 | 56% |