Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWBX
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWBX
REMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. REMSX (1.23B). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMSX (1.56) vs RNWBX (0.41). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than REMSX (1.29). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: REMSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.73 vs. RNWBX (18.14). REMSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.62 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| REMSX | RNWBX | REMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.66 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.66 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.709 | 12.082 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.41 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.73 | 18.14 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.05 | 39.22 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.62 | 9.30 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 97.97 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement