Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWFX
REMSX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWFX
REMSX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. REMSX (1.23B). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: REMSX (1.56) vs RNWFX (1.19). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). REMSX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMSX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.73 vs. RNWFX (19.68). REMSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.62 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| REMSX | RNWFX | REMSX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.62 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.709 | 12.700 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.73 | 19.68 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.05 | 44.28 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.62 | 14.77 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 110.07 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement