Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMSX vs RNWHX
REMSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts REMSX vs RNWHX
REMSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMSX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. REMSX (1.23B). REMSX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: REMSX (1.56) vs RNWHX (1.14). REMSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: REMSX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). REMSX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: REMSX (0) vs RNWHX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.73 vs. RNWHX (19.47). REMSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.62 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| REMSX | RNWHX | REMSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.72 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.709 | 12.651 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.14 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.73 | 19.47 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.05 | 43.67 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.62 | 14.04 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 107.31 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement