Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQCX vs RWMFX
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq C
Price$44.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.62M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. REQCX (157M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs REQCX (0.26). REQCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQCX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). REQCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. REQCX (-7.24). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. REQCX (-18.32).
| REQCX | RWMFX | REQCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.31 | 690% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.31 | 723% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.521 | 8.905 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.41 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.24 | 4.59 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.50 | 29.92 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.32 | 45.02 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.54 | 72.75 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement