Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQCX vs RWMFX
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq C
Price$44.94
Change-$0.24 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.87M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.35
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQCX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. REQCX (165M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs REQCX (0.26). REQCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQCX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). REQCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. REQCX (-2.83). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.63 vs. REQCX (-14.68).
| REQCX | RWMFX | REQCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.31 | 690% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.31 | 723% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.607 | 10.714 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.42 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.83 | 7.06 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.51 | 45.97 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.68 | 52.63 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.70 | 82.50 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement