Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQCX (271M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs REQCX (0.32). REQCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQCX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). REQCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. REQCX (-2.66). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. REQCX (-23.52).
| REQCX | RWMFX | REQCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.31 | 661% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.31 | 677% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.923 | 4.508 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.66 | 2.09 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.46 | 30.24 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.52 | 27.39 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.12 | 82.36 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers