Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts REQCX vs RWMFX
REQCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQCX (273M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than REQCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs REQCX (0.14). REQCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: REQCX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). REQCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: REQCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. REQCX (2.81). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. REQCX (-22.18).
| REQCX | RWMFX | REQCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.31 | 661% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.31 | 677% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 1.322 | 477% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.40 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 7.03 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.62 | 30.20 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.18 | 26.38 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.30 | 82.33 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement