Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQSX vs RWEBX
REQSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts REQSX vs RWEBX
REQSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQSX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQSX (157M). REQSX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: REQSX (1.03) vs RWEBX (0.75). REQSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: REQSX (18 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). REQSX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. REQSX (25.00). REQSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: REQSX (0) vs RWEBX (250). REQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. RWEBX (7.28). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.89 vs. REQSX (-17.27).
| REQSX | RWEBX | REQSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.06 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.06 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.155 | 7.392 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.75 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 7.28 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | 29.91 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.27 | 25.89 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.00 | 75.49 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement