Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REQSX vs RWEBX
REQSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts REQSX vs RWEBX
REQSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REQSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REQSX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQSX (151M). REQSX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: REQSX (1.10) vs RWEBX (0.75). REQSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: REQSX (18 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). REQSX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. REQSX (25.00). REQSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: REQSX (0) vs RWEBX (250). REQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. RWEBX (7.27). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.58 vs. REQSX (-19.79).
| REQSX | RWEBX | REQSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.06 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.06 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.208 | 1.220 | 919% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.75 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 7.27 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.37 | 27.51 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.79 | 23.58 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.20 | 75.86 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement